Political advertising doesn’t really convince voters
You are free to share this article under the Attribution 4.0 International license.
Regardless of content, context or audience, political ads can do little to convince voters, according to a new study.
The study in Science Advances measured the compelling impact of 49 high profile ads from the 2016 presidential campaign on a nationwide representative sample of 34,000 people through a series of 59 randomized experiments.
“… political ads consistently have low persuasive power across a range of characteristics.”
The study builds on previous research suggesting that political advertisements have little impact on voter preferences, and shows that these weak effects are consistent regardless of a number of factors, including the tone of an advertisement, timing and the partiality of the audience.
“There’s the idea that a really good ad, or one that is delivered to a target audience in the right context, can influence voters, but we’ve found that political ads are consistently low in persuasion on a number of characteristics,” says co-author Alexander Coppock. Assistant Professor of Political Science at Yale University.
“Positive ads don’t work any better than attack ads. Republicans, Democrats, and Independents respond similarly to ads. Ads broadcast in battlefield states are not much more effective than those broadcast in non-swing states. “
The researchers conducted the study during the 2016 presidential primaries and parliamentary elections.
Over 29 weeks, researchers randomly divided a representative sample of Americans into groups and asked them to watch campaign ads or a placebo ad – a commercial for auto insurance – before answering a brief survey.
The researchers selected ads based on real-time data on ad purchases and coverage of the top ads each week. They tested ads attacking or promoting Republican candidate Donald Trump and Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, as well as commercials for primary candidates such as Republican Ted Cruz and Democrat Bernie Sanders.
They analyzed the impact the ads had on respondents using multiple variables, including the candidate, party, or political action committee that sponsored them; whether they were positive or negative; the partiality of those who see the ads; the time until election day when they were broadcast; whether or not they were viewed in a battlefield state; and whether they aired during the primaries or general election.
They found that the ads, on average and across all variables, moved respondents only 0.05 points on the survey’s five-point scale, which is small but statistical given the size of the study is significant, the researchers note. The effect of the ads on the people who wanted to vote was even less – a statistically insignificant 0.007 percentage point.
Campaigns should carefully consider whether advertising should be tailored to specific audiences, as the persuasiveness of advertising has been shown to vary little from person to person or from advertisement to advertisement, the researchers conclude.
The results don’t prove that political advertising is always ineffective, says Coppock. The study did not analyze the impact of an entire advertising campaign.
“TV commercials help candidates gain public awareness, which is extremely important,” said Coppock, a fellow at the Yale Institution for Social Policy Studies and the Center for the Study of American Politics.
“Also, the effects we demonstrated were small but demonstrable and could mean the difference between winning and losing a close election.”
Other co-authors come from the University of California, San Diego and UCLA.
The Andrew F. Carnegie Corporation; UCLA’s Marvin Hoffenberg Chair of American Politics and Public Order; and JG Geer, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences at Vanderbilt University, supported the study.
Source: Yale University